National Adaptation Programme of Action
( NAPA )

Home | About NAPA | Guidelines | Documents | Country Report | Workshop


National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs)

The Marrakech Accords (COP 7) established a separate work programme for LDCs. This work programme includes the preparation of NAPAs, which opens up a simplified channel for LDCs to inform the international community of their prioritised urgent and immediate adaptation needs. The newly created LDC Fund will fund the preparation of NAPAs. In order to support LDCs in their preparation and implementation of NAPAs, the Marrakech Accords launched a LDC Expert Group (LEG) with a mandate to provide technical guidance and advice to LDCs and to facilitate information exchange and promote synergies with other multilateral environmental treaties as well as regional synergies.

National Adaptation Programme of Actions (NAPAs) are documents specifying a list of priority activities that will communicate immediate and urgent needs of LDCs, considering their high vulnerability and low adaptive capacity to climate change. The development of a NAPA document is not only intended to identify and prioritise urgent adaptation needs of LDCs but also help build capacity for the development of NatComs and to meet their obligations to the UNFCCC. An overview of climate variability, and observed and projected climate change and associated actual and potential adverse effects of climate change should be documented. This overview should be based on existing and ongoing studies and research, and/or empirical and historical information as well as traditional knowledge.

The main characteristics of a NAPA is that, it should be easy to understand, action oriented, country driven, and set clear priorities for urgent and immediate adaptation activities identified by each individual country. These adaptation activities and measures will also take into account the national planning processes, development goals and other multilateral environmental agreements and also identify potential barriers to implementation. The objective of a NAPA is to “serve as a simplified and direct channel of communication for information relating to urgent and immediate adaptation needs of LDCs”. The key outcome of the NAPA process is the identification of activities that should be pursued immediately, because further delay in implementing the activities could lead to increased vulnerability, or higher costs for delayed implementation. It has been highlighted by the UNFCCC that NAPAs should have a bottom-up action plan, not be just another lengthy document that joins the ranks of other action plans. The ending product should be a concise and well justified list of actions and projects to address priority vulnerabilities for the country or to build capacity to address those vulnerabilities.

What are LDCs

Three criteria, developed by the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, are used to determine which countries belong to the LDC group. The first one is the low-income criterion, which is based on a three-year average estimate of the GDP per capita. The GDP per capita must be under US$900 to be included in the LDC group and above US$1,035 to graduate from that group. The second criterion is the human resource weakness criterion, which involves the Augmented Physical Quality of Life Index (APQLI) based on nutrition, health, education and adult literacy indicators. The final criterion is the economic vulnerability criterion, which involves the Economic Vulnerability Index (EVI) based on indicators of: the instability of agricultural production, the instability of exports of goods and services, the economic importance of nontraditional activities (share of manufacturing and modern services in GDP), merchandise export concentration, and the handicap of economic smallness.

Country Population
(millions)
GNP/ capita
(US$)
Country Population
(millions)
GNP/ capita
(US$)
Afghanistan

Angola

Bangladesh

Benin

Bhutan

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cambodia

Cape Verde

Central African Republic

Chad

Comoros

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Djibouti

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Ethiopia

Gambia

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Haiti

Kiribati

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Lesotho

Liberia

21.4

12.1

124.8

5.8

0.6

11.3

6.5

10.7

0.4

3.5

7.3

0.7

9.1

0.6

0.4

3.6

59.7

1.2

7.3

2.2

8.0

0.9

5.2

2.1

2.7

380

350

380

470

240

140

260

1200

300

230

370

110

1110

200

100

340

530

160

410

1170

320

570

Madagascar

Malawi

Maldives

Mali

Mauritania

Mozambique

Myanmar

Nepal

Niger

Rwanda

Samoa

Sao Tome and Principe

Senegal

Sierra Leone

Solomon Islands

Somalia

Sudan

Togo

Tuvalu

Uganda

United Republic of Tanzania

Vanuatu

Yemen

Zambia

15.1

10.4

0.3

10.7

2.5

18.9

44.5

22.9

10.1

6.6

0.2

0.1

9.0

4.6

0.4

9.2

28.3

4.4

0.01

20.6

32.1

0.2

16.9

8.8

260

210

1130

250

410

210

210

200

230

1070

270

520

140

760

290

330

310

220

1260

280

330

LDCs and Climate Change

The LDCs have contributed least to the emission of greenhouse gases (see Figure 2), but are the most vulnerable to the effects of climate change, because of both their locations in some of the most vulnerable regions of the world (areas prone to floods, droughts, etc.), and their low capacity to adapt to such events.

LDCs and Climate Change Impacts

Africa is the most vulnerable region to climate change, due to the extreme poverty of many Africans, frequent natural disasters such as droughts and floods, and agricultural systems heavily dependent on rainfall. The main climate change impacts will be on water resources, food security and agriculture, natural resource management, biodiversity and human health. Although most LDCs are located in Africa (see Figure 1), those in Asia are also vulnerable. Issues of concern in Asia include water availability, food security and agriculture, ecosystems and biodiversity, and human health. Several LDCs are also small island states. These will face similar challenges, and countries such as the Maldives and Kiribati may even disappear if significant sea-level rise occurs.

Funding Adaptation and LDCs

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) created several funds at the second half of the sixth conference of parties (COP 6 bis) in Bonn, Germany in July 2001. One of these was the LDC Fund. At COP 7 in Marrakech, Morocco, in 2001, guidelines for the operation of the fund were established, and it was determined that the fund would be operated by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The LDC Fund will support the preparation of National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs). According to the GEF report to COP 8, the fund should be operational by 2003. The LDC fund is therefore probably one of the most rapid instruments to have been operationalised in the short history of the UNFCCC. However, it remains to be seen what the best way to actually use available funds will be.

The Community Development Carbon Fund

The World Bank, in collaboration with the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), intends to create a new fund to provide carbon finance through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The Community Development Carbon Fund (CDCF) will link small-scale projects seeking carbon finance with companies, governments, foundations, and NGOs seeking to improve the livelihoods of local communities and obtain verified emission reductions (ERs). Contributors to the fund will support projects that measurably benefit the poor and will receive ERs from abated or sequestered emissions. These 'Development + Carbon' ERs (ERs with the added value of development benefits) will have the potential to be recognized under emerging global, national, and regional programs. The target size for the CDCF is US$100 million.

The Special Climate Change Fund

The Special Climate Change Fund was established along with the LDC Fund at COP 6 bis. At COP 7 it was determined that the GEF should operate the Special Climate Change Fund. The fund will finance activities relating to climate change in the areas of adaptation; technology transfer; energy, transport, industry, agriculture, forestry and waste management; as well as activities to assist developing countries whose economies are highly dependent on income generated from fossil fuels in diversifying their economies. As with the LDC Fund, it remains to be seen what the best way to actually use available funds will be. Thus developing countries (particularly the LDCs) have a window of opportunity to determine how funds should be spent maximise adaptation benefits, before funding levels have been raised and stabilised in about 2005.

Source: www.iied.org

 

  web site maintained by SDNP, Bangladesh