|
National
Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs)
The Marrakech Accords
(COP 7) established a separate work programme for LDCs. This work programme
includes the preparation of NAPAs, which opens up a simplified channel for
LDCs to inform the international community of their prioritised urgent and
immediate adaptation needs. The newly created LDC Fund will fund the
preparation of NAPAs. In order to support LDCs in their preparation and
implementation of NAPAs, the Marrakech Accords launched a LDC Expert Group
(LEG) with a mandate to provide technical guidance and advice to LDCs and to
facilitate information exchange
and promote synergies with other multilateral environmental treaties as well
as regional synergies.
National
Adaptation Programme of Actions (NAPAs) are documents specifying a list of
priority activities that will communicate immediate and urgent needs of LDCs,
considering their high vulnerability and low adaptive capacity to climate
change. The development of a NAPA document is not only intended to identify and
prioritise urgent adaptation needs of LDCs but also help build capacity for the
development of NatComs and to meet their obligations to the UNFCCC. An overview
of climate variability, and observed and projected climate change and associated
actual and potential adverse effects of climate change should be documented.
This overview should be based on existing and ongoing studies and research,
and/or empirical and historical information as well as traditional knowledge.
The main
characteristics of a NAPA is that, it should be easy to understand,
action oriented, country driven, and set clear priorities for urgent
and immediate adaptation activities identified by each individual
country. These adaptation activities and measures will also take
into account the national planning processes, development goals and
other multilateral environmental agreements and also identify
potential barriers to implementation. The objective of a NAPA is to
“serve as a simplified and direct channel of communication for
information relating to urgent and immediate adaptation needs of LDCs”. The key outcome of the NAPA process is the identification of
activities that should be pursued immediately, because further delay
in implementing the activities could lead to increased
vulnerability, or higher costs for delayed implementation. It has
been highlighted by the UNFCCC that NAPAs should have a bottom-up
action plan, not be just another lengthy document that joins the
ranks of other action plans. The ending product should be a concise
and well justified list of actions and projects to address priority
vulnerabilities for the country or to build capacity to address
those vulnerabilities.
What are LDCs
Three criteria, developed by the
Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, are used to
determine which countries belong to the LDC group. The first one is
the low-income criterion, which is based on a three-year average
estimate of the GDP per capita. The GDP per capita must be under
US$900 to be included in the LDC group and above US$1,035 to
graduate from that group. The second criterion is the human resource
weakness criterion, which involves the Augmented Physical Quality of
Life Index (APQLI) based on nutrition, health, education and adult
literacy indicators. The final criterion is the economic
vulnerability criterion, which involves the Economic Vulnerability
Index (EVI) based on indicators of: the instability of agricultural
production, the instability of exports of goods and services, the
economic importance of nontraditional activities (share of
manufacturing and modern services in GDP), merchandise export
concentration, and the handicap of economic smallness.
|
Country |
Population
(millions) |
GNP/ capita
(US$) |
Country |
Population
(millions) |
GNP/ capita
(US$) |
|
Afghanistan
Angola
Bangladesh
Benin
Bhutan
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Comoros
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gambia
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Haiti
Kiribati
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Lesotho
Liberia |
21.4
12.1
124.8
5.8
0.6
11.3
6.5
10.7
0.4
3.5
7.3
0.7
9.1
0.6
0.4
3.6
59.7
1.2
7.3
2.2
8.0
0.9
5.2
2.1
2.7 |
–
380
350
380
470
240
140
260
1200
300
230
370
110
–
1110
200
100
340
530
160
410
1170
320
570
– |
Madagascar
Malawi
Maldives
Mali
Mauritania
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nepal
Niger
Rwanda
Samoa
Sao Tome and Principe
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Solomon Islands
Somalia
Sudan
Togo
Tuvalu
Uganda
United Republic of Tanzania
Vanuatu
Yemen
Zambia |
15.1
10.4
0.3
10.7
2.5
18.9
44.5
22.9
10.1
6.6
0.2
0.1
9.0
4.6
0.4
9.2
28.3
4.4
0.01
20.6
32.1
0.2
16.9
8.8 |
260
210
1130
250
410
210
–
210
200
230
1070
270
520
140
760
–
290
330
–
310
220
1260
280
330 |
LDCs and
Climate Change
The LDCs have contributed least
to the emission of greenhouse gases (see Figure 2), but are the most
vulnerable to the effects of climate change, because of both their locations
in some of the most vulnerable regions of the world (areas prone to floods,
droughts, etc.), and their low capacity to adapt to such events.

LDCs and Climate Change Impacts
Africa is the most vulnerable
region to climate change, due to the extreme poverty of many Africans,
frequent natural disasters such as droughts and floods, and agricultural
systems heavily dependent on rainfall. The main climate change impacts will
be on water resources, food security and agriculture, natural resource
management, biodiversity and human health. Although most LDCs are located in
Africa (see Figure 1), those in Asia are also vulnerable. Issues of concern
in Asia include water availability, food security and agriculture,
ecosystems and biodiversity, and human health. Several LDCs are also small
island states. These will face similar challenges, and countries such as the
Maldives and Kiribati may even disappear if significant sea-level rise
occurs.
Funding Adaptation and LDCs
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
created several funds at the second half of the sixth conference of parties
(COP 6 bis) in Bonn, Germany in July 2001. One of these was the LDC Fund. At
COP 7 in Marrakech, Morocco, in 2001, guidelines for the operation of the
fund were established, and it was determined that the fund would be operated
by the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The LDC Fund will support the
preparation of National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs). According
to the GEF report to COP 8, the fund should be operational by 2003. The LDC
fund is therefore probably one of the most rapid instruments to have been
operationalised in the short history of the UNFCCC. However, it remains to
be seen what the best way to actually use available funds will be.
The Community Development Carbon Fund
The World Bank, in collaboration with the International
Emissions Trading Association (IETA), intends to create a new fund to
provide carbon finance through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The
Community Development Carbon Fund (CDCF) will link small-scale projects
seeking carbon finance with companies, governments, foundations, and NGOs
seeking to improve the livelihoods of local communities and obtain verified
emission reductions (ERs). Contributors to the fund will support projects
that measurably benefit the poor and will receive ERs from abated or
sequestered emissions. These 'Development + Carbon' ERs (ERs with the added
value of development benefits) will have the potential to be recognized
under emerging global, national, and regional programs. The target size for
the CDCF is US$100 million.
The Special Climate Change Fund
The Special Climate Change Fund was established along with
the LDC Fund at COP 6 bis. At COP 7 it was determined that the GEF should
operate the Special Climate Change Fund. The fund will finance activities
relating to climate change in the areas of adaptation; technology transfer;
energy, transport, industry, agriculture, forestry and waste management; as
well as activities to assist developing countries whose economies are highly
dependent on income generated from fossil fuels in diversifying their
economies. As with the LDC Fund, it remains to be seen what the best way to
actually use available funds will be. Thus developing countries
(particularly the LDCs) have a window of opportunity to determine how funds
should be spent maximise adaptation benefits, before funding levels have
been raised and stabilised in about 2005.
Source: www.iied.org
|