|
|
|
|
|
The Day |
|
|
Message |
|
|
Technical
Information |
|
-
What is Ozone |
|
-
Twenty Q/A About Ozone |
|
-
CFCs |
|
-
Ozone Hole 2000-2005 |
|
-
Ozone Friendly Products |
|
|
Ozone and
Bangladesh |
|
|
Emissions Situation Bangladesh |
|
|
Reports and
Publications |
|
|
Convention and Treaties |
|
|
Data |
|
|
Useful Links |
|
|
Bangladesh and GHG Emissions
Carbon di-oxide
emissions
The commercial energy in
Bangladesh is supplied from the following sources:
i) Natural gas (Indigeneous)
ii) Petroleum
a) Imported petroleum
products
b) Imported crude oil
c) Local crude oil from Haripur Oil Field
iii) Coal, primarily
imported, and
iv) Hydropower
Among these, the last one
is not used for estimation of any carbon di-oxide emission, The carbon
di-oxide emission from the consumption of the rest, all fossil fuels,
has been calculated using the 6-step methodology. The estimates are
summarised in Table-1,
From these estimates, one
reaches the following conclusions:
-
The total carbon
dioxide released from all primary fossil fuel use in Bangladesh
amounted to 13,443 Gg in 1990.
-
The corresponding value
of carbon (oxidized) amounted to 3,666 Gg in the base year.
-
On a per capita basis
the above values of carbon dioxide and carbon emission (1990
population being 109 million) amounted to just about 123,3 and 33.6
Kgs respectively.
-
Biomass combustion
caused an annual release of 61283.7 Gg of CO2 in 1990. The emission
from agricultural residues contributed to about 59% of total emissions
from biomass energy combustion. As indicated earlier, however,
emission from biomass combustion has not been considered for
estimating total carbon di-oxide emission.
Emission from energy
production
In Bangladesh, natural
gas is the only indigenous source of commercial energy, excepting a
little oil discovered in 1987 and coal which remain yet to be mined.
Hence natural gas production is the only source from which methane
emission needs to be considered, The natural gas companies reported the
following two types of natural gas losses during production and
distribution:
Venting and flaring
losses
6.983 MMCF/Yr.
Transmission and distribution losses 305.010 MMCF/Yr.
Total
311.993 MMCF/Yr.
Corrected for average
methane content of Bangladesh natural gas (96%), the total loss equalled
299.51 MMCF/Yr. Converted into weight, it is estimated that about 6.1 Gg
of methane (CH4) gas is emitted due to energy (natural gas) production.
Table- 1 : CO2
emissions from primary energy sources in Bangladesh
|
Primary energy Sources |
Apparent Energy Consumption (PJ) |
Carbon Emission Factor (103
tC/PJ) |
Net Carbon Emission (Gg) |
Fraction of Carbon |
Total CO2 Emitted (Gg) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Natural Gas |
135.0 |
15.3 |
2,224.8 |
0.995 |
8,116.8 |
| Petroleum
Products |
85.1 |
0.70 |
1,200.7 |
0.990 |
4,358.5 |
| Highspeed
diesel |
42.4 |
19.5 |
720.4 |
|
|
|
Superior Kerosene |
20.7 |
19.6 |
140.4 |
|
|
| Furnace oil |
6.8 |
20.2 |
258.0 |
|
|
| Motor spirit |
4.9 |
17.2 |
6.9 |
|
|
| Jet
propellant |
4.2 |
19.5 |
55.7 |
|
|
| Jet batching
oil |
1.2 |
21.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
| Lubricating |
1.5 |
20.0 |
13.2 |
|
|
| Bitumen |
|
1.6 |
22.0 |
0.0 |
|
| Others |
|
1.9 |
20.0 |
6.1 |
|
| Coal
(anthracite) |
12.4 |
26.8 |
269.3 |
0.980 |
967.6 |
| Total |
|
13,442.9 |
|
Source: Global climate Change: Bangladesh
Episode, DOE, MoEF, GOB. |
Emission from
Landfills
Very little quantitative
information exists in Bangladesh on municipal waste. The Study Team
could obtain some information only from Dhaka City and some fragmented
information on other principal towns. In Dhaka, the following
information could be collected, but again in a fragmentary manner:
Municipal solid waste
generated
Municipal waste used for landfilling
Total area landfilled
Quite obviously, the
available information were incomplete and inadequate. Accordingly,
expert judgement and conjectures had to be used in interpreting these
information. Be that as it may, the methane emission from six (6) major
urban areas of Bangladesh (the capital city of Dhaka, port cities
Chittagong and Khulna and three other district towns - Rajshahi, Sylhet
and Mymensingh) from land fills has been estimated at about 73.6 Gg per
year.
Emissions from
Agriculture, Livestock and Waste Water
This section deals with methane emission from various non-energy sources
such as flooded rice fields, enteric fermentation in livestock, manure
management and anaerobic waste water treatment in municipalities. The
general methodology and approach and the default values provided in the
given workbooks are modified as deemed necessary to better represent
country specific situations. For example, for a variety of reasons, the
methane flux in Bangladesh rice cultivation is expected to be
significantly lower than in other countries. The rationale for using
such country specific values for the calculations are given in details
in the relevant final report.
Emission from rice
fields
There is a high degree of
uncertainty in the global flux measurements in case of methane,
particularly from rice fields. Experiments have shown that the Methane
flux from flooded rice fields varies with soil type, temperature, redox
potential, and acidity/alkalinity of the soil; the type, timing,
application method and amount of fertiliser applied; water management
technique; and cultivar type (Schutz et al.,1990; Matthews et al.,
1991). A range (i.e., 0.19 - 0.69 gCH4fm2/day) for daily emission
fluxes, based on the field experiments (Schutz et al., 1989), has been
recommended as default values by the OECD report (OECD, 1991) for
estimating national CH4 emissions from flooded rice fields. This range,
however, has been scaled down on the basis of several criteria
applicable to Bangladesh situation. The modified fluxes may be found in
the Final Report of the Emission Study.
In estimating methane
emission from flooded rice fields the harvested area for each of the
major rice varieties are estimated in the first step. This is done by
subtracting the area under non-irrigated uplands from the gross
harvested area for each of the varieties. Depending on the local
agricultural practice and water regime management during rice
cultivation, the length of continuously and intermittently flooded days
are derived from existing database of Bangladesh Agriculture Research
Council.
Emission factors are
derived by scaling down the range 0.19 to 0.69 gim2/day (Schutz et ai,
1989) to suit to local conditions and practices in the country. However,
this has been done on the basis of expert judgement and needs to be
verified through experiments in future.
The lower bound estimates
show that Bangladesh emits about 257 Gg of CH4 from flooded rice fields.
The upper bound estimate is 622 Gg of CH4. Considering the median
values, it is estimated that rice cultivation emits about 468 Gg of
methane gas per year. HYV Boro rice (which is dependent on irrigation)
contributes about 42% to the methane emission from rice fields followed
by HYV transplanted Aman (about 31 %).
Emission from
livestock
Bangladesh has one of the
highest densities of livestock population per unit of land in the world.
But the country does not have any pastoral land dedicated only to
grazing. Animals feed themselves by scavenging in and around the
cultivated lands and homesteads. Partly, they are also fed with rice
straws and husks. On the whole there is a feed shortage. This is
reflected in the poor health condition of the animals. Due to lack of
adequate nutrition, the animals are under-weight. The average body
weight of cattle is only 200-250 Kg for local breeds and 300-450 Kg for
improved breeds. These figures are quite low compared to those
elsewhere. As expected, the low body-weights result in low level of CH4
emission by enteric fermentation from
livestock sector in Bangladesh. It is estimated that about 446.8 Gg of
methane is emitted from enteric fermentation of livestock, 67.5% of
which is contributed by non-dairy cattle.
For estimation of methane
emission due to manure management, use has been made O.f the default
methane emission values by livestock types, as presented in the GHG
Emission Inventory Workbook (ICF Inc., 1995). It is estimated that 73.07
Gg of methane is emitted from manure management a large fraction of
which comes from non-dairy cattle.
Emission from waste
water treatment
Traditionally waste water
from households, be it in the rural or in the urban areas, is ultimately
discharged in the open space or in the water bodies. There is only one
exception to this traditional practice in the capital city Dhaka. There
is a waste water treatment plant adjacent to
Dhaka which treats waste water from municipal sources, but the treatment
is not anaerobic. Therefore, waste water from domestic sources in
Bangladesh do not emit any significant amount of methane gas.
Industries also discharge
huge quantities of waste water into surface water systems. In most cases
such waste water is not treated before being discharged. Only recently a
few of these industries have taken measures to treat the waste water
before releasing it to the nearby surface water system. But there is no
systematic database regarding the actual amount of industrial waste
water being treated anaerobically. Therefore, methane emission from
industrial waste water could not be estimated.
Emissions from Land
Use Change and Open Bio-mass Burning
Land use change is often
considered to be a major source of GHGs, particularly of CO2, in
developing countries. Usually, when forest land is cleared for
agricultural or other purposes by felling trees, a part of the carbon
locked in them is released as parts of the trees are used as fuel wood,
the land clearing takes place through slash and burning and because the
soil is disturbed which also release the carbon locked therein. On the
other hand if the area under forest or tree cover increases there is
likely to be a net sink effect.
Forest area
characteristics
The forest area includes
officially classified and unclassified state forest land, homestead
forest land in rural areas, tea and rubber gardens etc. The private
forest areas are tree covered while much of the state forest land is
barren of tree vegetation. Still, there are 835,000 ha of state forest
land having reasonable vegetation; over in the better quality natural
forest areas and bamboo areas and plantations, excluding the parks and
sanctuaries. This good quality forest area accounts for 5.8% of the
total land in Bangladesh. Apart from the different kinds of forest
areas, there are other areas in the country where afforestation has
taken place in recent years, especially along the newly built
embankments and road sides.
Non-CO2 emissions from
Bio-mass Burning
In rural Bangladesh a
portion of the above ground bio-mass is left in the fields after each
harvest. A fraction of the bio- mass is mulched during the field
preparation for the next crop and in some areas farmers amass the dried
bio-mass to make a small heap and deliberately set them afire. This open
air burning results into emission of gases such as CO2, CO, CH4, N20 and
NOx.
Since the major crop in
Bangladesh is rice, estimation for emission of non-CO2 gases was done in
terms of field burning of paddy-straw only. The amount of CO2 released
was not estimated assuming that it would be balanced by locking of
carbon by growing plants during the next cropping season. It is found
that about 695.4 Gg carbon and about 9.7 Gg nitrogen is being released
annually from field burning of bio-mass sources.
Also, as discussed
earlier, the major source of rural energy in Bangladesh is the bio-mass
source which provides rice straws, husks, dung, twigs and leaves,
baggage, jute sticks, fuel-wood etc. It is estimated that traditional
bio-mass fuel combustion in open air releases about 189.5 Gg methane
gas, 2339.9 Gg of carbon monoxide gas, 2.4 Gg of N20 and 85.9 Gg of NOx
gas.
Summary of Total
Emissions
Collecting all the
results mentioned so far, one may arrive at an aggregate emission figure
as shown in Table-5. The estimates indicate that on the basis of global
warming potentials, more than one-half is due to methane while about 30%
is contributed by CO2 from fossil fuel burning.
|
Sources of GHG emission |
Quantity of GHG emitted(Gg) |
Global warming potential (100 years time
horizon) |
|
| Combustion
of fossil fuel |
13,443
as CO2 |
13,443 |
| Energy
production |
79.7
as CH4 |
1,953 |
| Flooded rice
fields |
468 as
CH4 |
11,513 |
| Livestock
(enteric fermentation & manure management) |
520 as
CH4 |
12,792 |
|
Burning of Agriculture residues |
4.7 as
CH4 |
116 |
| 97.3
as CH4 |
|
| 0.11
as N2O |
3 |
| 3.84 as NOx |
|
| Forest (sink
and source) |
No net
emission |
|
|
Biomass burning |
189.5
as CH4 |
4,662 |
| 2,340 as CO |
|
| 2.4 as
N2O |
59 |
| 86 as NOx |
|
| All
Sources |
|
44,541 |
|
Source: Global climate Change:
Bangladesh Episode, DOE, MoEF, GOB. |
Major
Decisions on Vehicular Emission
Source : Global Climate Change
: Bangladesh Episode, 1997, DOE, MoEF-GOB. |