Image link to home page
ItemHome ItemThis Is USAID ItemPrivacy ItemWhat's New ItemMissions ItemEmployment ItemSearch ItemContact
spacer image

Bangladesh

>> Regional Overview >> Bangladesh Overview

ACTIVITY DATA SHEET

PROGRAM: Bangladesh
TITLE AND NUMBER: Improved Performance of the Energy Sector, 388-007
STATUS: Continuing
PLANNED FY 2001 OBLIGATION AND FUNDING SOURCE: $2,500, 000 DA
PROPOSED FY 2002 OBLIGATION AND FUNDING SOURCE: $1,500,000 DA; $1,500,000 ESF
INITIAL OBLIGATION: FY 1996    ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: FY 2006

Summary: While the Bangladesh Government continues to pursue a number of significant reforms in the energy sector, encompassing both power and gas, implementation has been slower than hoped. The goals, however, of open market policies and increased private sector investment remain unchanged. Within this context, the focus for USAID program activities continues to be the efficient use of energy and a decrease in system loss, both of which can be achieved by enhancing institutional capacity and encouraging policies that promote competition and the use of natural gas. Attention is also being given to encouraging cooperation and eventual trade in clean energy between Bangladesh and other south Asian nations.

This objective aims to improve the performance and efficiency of the energy sector, thus enabling and promoting overall economic development. An important aspect of this work is the development and usage of a clean energy source (natural gas), thereby reducing overall greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. USAID is working to increase the usage of clean fuel in commercial energy mix to meet overall energy supply need; increase per capita consumption of clean energy; and increase the number of rural population with access to electricity.

Key Results: The "unbundling" of the power sector is continuing; the FY 2000 target for transmission line transfer to the Power Grid Company of Bangladesh (PGCB) has been met. Similarly, the target for total rural electric connections, which is vital to economic growth in these areas, was slightly surpassed. Three 10 MW plants were constructed and will be commissioned and operating during FY 2001. This is significant in that it is strictly a commercial venture, with USAID playing a facilitating role only, and is indicative of Bangladesh's increasing openess to private investment in the power sector.

Bangladesh has been slow in reaching consensus on how its natural gas resources can best be used to benefit the country. These delays have discouraged further new investment in the natural gas and power sectors. To provide an objective analysis of the natural gas resources base, USAID promoted and funded a substantial joint Petrobangla/U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) study to assess Bangladesh's natural gas potential and funded or supported a variety of other seminars/ workshops focusing on the experience of other countries in developing and maximizing the use of their natural gas resources. USAID also financed a study analyzing the financial and technical feasibly of natural gas-generated power export to India and provided technical advice regarding proposed natural gas reform legislation through a Participating Agency Service Agreement (PASA) with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

Performance and Prospects: In FY 2000, work continued in the rural power sector, which USAID has supported since 1977, and effectively began in the gas sector with the negotiation of a strategic objective agreement and the initiation of a range of studies and training activities in the power and gas sectors.

Also, activities continued to strengthen the capacity of the Rural Electrification Board (REB) and the rural power cooperatives to provide more reliable energy and better services to their rural customers through improved systems management and operation. USAID's efforts in building capacity to provide rural power through greater connections and increased power generation will stimulate economic activity in the rural areas.

With the discovery of significant gas fields, Bangladesh has the opportunity to use this resource to strengthen and expand its energy sector and to spur economic growth and development. Bangladesh currently produces about 270 billion cubic feet (BCF) of natural gas per year. A recently completed assessment study carried out jointly by USGS and Petrobangla estimates a mean of 32 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of undiscovered, technically recoverable gas resources. This study provides Bangladesh with further assurance that it can significantly expand gas-sector development and seriously consider gas export to spur economic growth and development. In FY 2001 USAID will begin implementing multi-year technical assistance and training programs for GOB natural gas and electric power entities. This policy-oriented assistance will improve GOB capacity to undertake and implement sound energy sector policy reform, including restructuring, unbundling and regulatory reform.

In 2001, activities will continue in educating the public and the media about energy issues and development implications. Key activities will include establishing a transparent energy information system; support for studies regarding the country's energy resources; economic analysis of the potential downstream use of energy resources; and seminars and workshops to disseminate the results of these studies to the GOB, press, labor force, and the private sector. USAID also plans to negotiate a new funding arrangement with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to provide technical assistance from a variety of specialized USG agencies.

Possible Adjustments to Plans: While the pace of power-sector reform has picked up in the past year, it is unlikely that significant new energy reform will take place in either the power or natural gas sectors until after national elections, which will take place during 2001. It is likely that any new government, early in its term of office, will move ahead in energy sector reform and liberalization, including passage of the Power Sector and Natural Gas Reform Acts. These acts will permit establishment of an independent regulatory authority for the power and gas sector, and should provide investors and the various stakeholders with additional confidence in the GOB's willingness to reform. However, should significant reform efforts remain stalled, adjustments to this activity will be necessary.

Other Donor Programs: For years, multilateral donor agencies and many bilateral donors have funded various energy sector infrastructure projects. However, such capital funding has been shrinking in recent years. Like the U.S. Government, other donors are now focusing more on the capacity building and reform process, with increasing emphasis on the efficient and pragmatic use of the natural and human resources for sustainable economic growth. Donors' efforts are coordinated through periodic meetings of energy-sector donors and GOB officials. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) normally organizes and chairs these meetings.

Presently, the World Bank and the GOB are negotiating a loan of $100 million for rural electrification. ADB recently approved a loan of $300 million to upgrade distribution and transmission of power in Dhaka, conditioned on certain reform measures, and has several smaller assistance projects underway. Fourteen donors are currently funding electrical hardware supplies and other commodities for rural power infrastructure development. These donor activities complement USAID's program to improve the institutional capacity and enabling environment for energy sector reform and, hence, improve the performance of the energy sector.

Principal Contractors, Grantees, or Agencies: The National Rural Electric Cooperatives Association is implementing the Rural Power for Poverty Program. Through a USAID-financed Participating Agency Services Agreement with U.S. Department of Energy, a number of U.S. agencies are providing technical assistance and training to GOB entities.

FY 2002 Performance Table

Bangladesh: 388-007

Performance Measures:

Indicator FY97 (Actual) FY98 (Actual) FY99 (Actual) FY00 (Actual) FY00 (Plan) FY01 (Plan) FY02 (Plan)
Indicator 1: Power Sector Reform Act finalized and submitted to the Cabinet NA NA 0 Plan was drafted 1 1 Submitted NA
Indicator 2: Policy-makers and professionals better informed of energy sector reform NA NA 2,570 NA 7,570 12,570 NA
Indicator 3: Small power generation program exists and functioning NA NA 0 0 30 50 70
Indicator 4: Total number of rural electric connections NA NA 2.51 2.905 2.9 3.3 3.75
Indicator 5: Progress in unbundling of transmission NA NA 45 61.5 61.5 450 600

Indicator Information:

Indicator Level (S) or (IR) Unit of Measure Source Indicator Description
Indicator 1: IR Number of acts finalized Mission, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) "The indicator, Power Sector Reform Act Finalized and Submitted to the Cabinet, is an IR level indicator. The same IR (IR 7.2) - Improved enabling environment, has five more indicators: Indicator 7.2.1 - Natural Gas Act Finalized and Submitted to the Cabinet, Indicator 7.2.3 - Implementing Regulations Ready for Approval, Indicator 7.2.4 - Improved Contract Implementation and Management, Indicator 7.2.5 - Policy-makers and Professionals Better Informed of Energy Sector Reform, and Indicator 7.2.6 - Development of Guidelines for Open Market Policies. We are reporting on two indicators (Indicators 7.2.2 and 7.2.5) this year and plan to report on other indicators, as appropriate, beginning with the FY 2004 R4. We are using a two-way measure for the reported indicator. At this point, however, we are reporting only one measure. Reports on the other measure will be provided in the FY 2004 R4s. Numbers are cumulative. Enactment and implementation of the power sector reform act is the key to reforming the current government-owned, vertically integrated and highly inefficient and unresponsive power sector. "
Indicator 2: IR Number of persons trained Mission, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR), G/ENV, Contractors Note that this indicator is not being reported on the FY 2003 R4; instead the number of electrical connections will be used. This indicator was used in past R4s. The indicator, Indicator 7.2.5 - Policy-makers and Professionals Better Informed of Energy Sector Reform, is an IR level indicator. The same IR (IR 7.2) - Improved enabling environment, has five more indicators: Indicator 7.2.1 - Natural Gas Act Finalized and Submitted to the Cabinet, Indicator 7.2.2 - Power Sector Reform Act Finalized and Submitted to the Cabinet, Indicator 7.2.3 - Implementing Regulations Ready for Approval, Indicator 7.2.4 - Improved Contract Implementation and Management, and Indicator 7.2.6 - Development of Guidelines for Open Market Policies. We are reporting on two indicators (Indicators 7.2.2 and 7.2.5) this year and plan to report on other indicators, as appropriate, beginning with the FY 2004 R4. Numbers are cumulative.
Indicator 3: IR The installed generation capacity from small power plants in rural areas measured in megawatts. Mission, Rural Electrification Board (REB), National Rural Electrification Cooperative Association (NRECA) "The indicator is another measure of institutional capacity building of the power sector in so far as the capacity to augment rural power generation is concerned. Current emphasis under RPPR, in view of problems in electric supply from the national grid, is on rural power generation. This will supplement PDB supply, ease acute power shortages and help overcome problems arising out of frequent power outages in the rural areas.

The 30 MW indicated in the table will be generated from gas-fired units located at three different places, each with a generating capacity of 10 MW. It is to be noted that 80 MW generated from a privately owned company in Mymensingh is not included, as this is not an exclusively REB initiative. However, USAID has actively supported private participation in the power sector and can claim partial credit for this undertaking. Note that the R4 2002 used "" Number of Plants"" in operation as the indicator. Since each plant has the capacity of 10 MW, this year's indicator targets are expressed in megawatts, which will better express the amount of clean energy produced.

Numbers are cumulative."

Indicator 4: IR The number of electrical connections made to rural consumers in millions Rural Electirfication Board and the contractor records (NRECA) The indicator is another measure of institutional capacity building of the power sector in so far as the augmentation of rural power coverage is concerned. Note that this indicator was not used in the R4 2002, but was used in prior years' R4. This indicator is a more appropriate measure for this IR. IT includes irrigation and consumer electrical connections.
Indicator 5: IR Kilometers of 230 kilovolt electric transmission line. Mission, Power Grid Company of Bangladesh (PGCB), Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR) This indicator measures the extent to which electric transmission lines currently held by the integrated public utility have been transferred to a separate transmission company. The extent to which this occurs is a progress measure for the "unbundling" process. This indicator will be tracked until all public transmission lines have been transferred. The same IR (IR 7.1) - Increased Institutional Capacity to Make Decisions in Clean Energy Development has two more indicators: Indicator 7.1.2 - Reduced Systems Loss in Distribution of Electricity and Indicator 7.1.3 - Small Power Generation Program Exists and Functioning. We are reporting on two indicators (Indicators 7.1.1 and 7.1.3) this year and plan to report on the third indicator (Indicator 7.1.2) beginning with the FY 2004 R4. We are using a three-way measure for the reported indicator. At this point, however, we are reporting only one measure. Reports on the other measures will be provided in the FY 2004 R4s. Numbers are cumulative.

U.S. Financing

(In thousands of dollars)

  Obligations   Expenditures   Unliquidated  
Through September 30, 1999 *    6,757 DA 0 DA 6,757 DA
0 CSD 0 CSD 0 CSD
0 ESF 0 ESF 0 ESF
0 SEED 0 SEED 0 SEED
0 FSA 0 FSA 0 FSA
0 DFA 0 DFA 0 DFA
Fiscal Year 2000 3,000 DA 2,440 DA  
0 CSD 0 CSD
0 ESF 0 ESF
0 SEED 0 SEED
0 FSA 0 FSA
0 DFA 0 DFA
Through September 30, 2000 9,757 DA 2,440 DA 7,317 DA
0 CSD 0 CSD 0 CSD
0 ESF 0 ESF 0 ESF
0 SEED 0 SEED 0 SEED
0 FSA 0 FSA 0 FSA
0 DFA 0 DFA 0 DFA
Prior Year Unobligated Funds 0 DA  
0 CSD
0 ESF
0 SEED
0 FSA
0 DFA
Planned Fiscal Year 2001 NOA 2,500 DA  
0 CSD
0 ESF
0 SEED
0 FSA
0 DFA
Total Planned Fiscal Year 2001 2,500 DA  
0 CSD
0 ESF
0 SEED
0 FSA
0 DFA
      Future Obligations   Est. Total Cost  
Proposed Fiscal Year 2002 NOA 1,500 DA 23,000 DA 36,757 DA
0 CSD 0 CSD 0 CSD
1,500 ESF 0 ESF 1,500 ESF
0 SEED 0 SEED 0 SEED
0 FSA 0 FSA 0 FSA
0 DFA 0 DFA 0 DFA

*9/30/99 unliquidated obligation comes from continuing activities folded under this new SO from a completed SO 388-002 and should not be treated as part of this SO's est. total cost.


Home | Privacy | What's New? | Directory | Missions | Employment | Search
Have a question or comment about USAID or the USAID website?
Visit our contact page to find the appropriate resource.